Legal Opinion

Olson v. Witherow

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1945No. 33,944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

This was an appeal from an order denying the motion of James M. Witherow for a new trial. To be considered and determined here is the question whether this court should grant his present motion, which is one to be relieved of default “in printing and filing his brief” within the time limited by Rule XI of this court, which provides (200 Minn, xxxi):

“Respondent may apply to the court for judgment of affirmance or dismissal if the appellant shall fail or neglect to serve and file the printed record and his brief as required by these rules. * * * If appellant is in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holmes v. CathcartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. First National Bank v. TowleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Betcher v. BetcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Brown v. StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. State ex rel. Benz v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of HaugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API