Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Wood

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1915No. 9,107PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From St. Joseph Circuit Court; Walter A. Funic, Judge. Action by Sarah Hutchinson against Maud Wood and others. From the judgment rendered, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Shea, G. J.

The trial court in this case made a special finding of facts, the substance of which is as follows: That on February 12, 1906, one John W. Reynolds was the owner of certain described real estate in St. Joseph County, Indiana, and on that date the treasurer of said county sold the undivided one-eighth of said lands to one Isaac Farneman for nonpayment of taxes. Said taxes were not paid, nor was the land redeemed from the sale, and oh February 13, 1908, the county auditor executed a tax-title deed to Farneman for the undivided one-eighth of said lands, which was duly recorded…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Unfried v. HebererIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Stonehill v. StonehillIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Farrar v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Elliott v. FrakesIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. McBurnie v. SeatonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carson v. CarsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Pavuk v. ScheetzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Lizak v. SchultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Williams v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  5. Williams v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API