Legal Opinion

Lizak v. Schultz

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1986No. 45S03-8608-CV-716PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

Two important questions in domestic relations law were recently addressed by the Third District of the Court of Appeals. First, does a dissolution court retain jurisdiction to reduce child support arrearage to a judgment after the death of the custodial parent? Second, does the administrator of the estate of the deceased custodian have standing to bring such an action? The Court of Appeals answered both questions in the affirmative. Lizak v. Schultz (1985), Ind.App., 480 N.E.2d 962. The Court of Appeals reached the right conclusion for the right reasons, and we believe that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Corbridge v. CorbridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hendrickson v. BinkleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Linton v. LintonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Stonehill v. StonehillIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Grace v. QuiggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Straub v. B.M.T. Ex Rel. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Felix C. Sickels v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Matter of HenadyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
  4. Warsco v. HambrightIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Matter of Paternity of MLBIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API