Legal Opinion
Cranz v. White
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Error from Montgomery District Court. The nature of the action, and the facts, appear in the opinion. At the September Term, 1881, of the district court, defendant, White, recovered a judgment against C. Cranz and A. C. Voris, as assignees of J. F. Lieberling & Co., plaintiffs, who bring the case here.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by ■
Brewer, J.:
The question in this case is one of exemption under the pension laws of the United States. The facts are these: To garnishee proceedings against the defendant in error, certain bankers garnished answered in these words:
“In the month of April, Mr. White came into the bank with pension checks or drafts to the amount of twenty-eight hundred and twenty-six dollars and eighty-two cents, ($2,826.82.) He indorsed the same and passed them to me, and I gave him or his account credit for the said sum. We took and bought the cheeks or drafts in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eckert v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1872
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cavanaugh v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- State ex rel. Smith v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Pefly v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Rozelle v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Emmert v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.