Legal Opinion

Still v. City of Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 1901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Harris. Tried below before Hon. C. E. Ashe.

1Opinion of the Court

GILL, Associate Justice.

This suit was brought by H. C. Still against the city of Houston to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him as a resut of a defective sidewalk along one of the public streets of the city of Houston, the defect being ■due to the negligence of the city. The answer of the city contained a general denial, and a special plea to the effect that, by the force of one ■of its charter provisions, it was exempt from liability resulting from defects in streets and sidewalks, except when they had been permitted to remain out of repair for ten…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayor, Aldermen & Inhabitants of Houston v. IsaacksTexas Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Tewksbury v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  4. City of Dallas v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Updike v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API