Legal Opinion

Cleaver v. Judd

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

Defendants appeal from a decree enjoining them from diverting the waters in an unnamed draw which are used by plaintiffs for irrigation purposes.

The suit may be described roughly as a contest between an irrigation district and two owners of farm land over the right to water in a draw extending through a part of the irrigation district. ① Defendants contend that aside from surface water runoff the water in the draw consists solely of waste and seepage water from its irrigation project and that they have a right to recapture these waters while still within the boundaries of the reclamation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brighton Ditch Co. v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  2. Stevens v. Oakdale Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Binning v. Miller, Water Division SuperintendentWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Vaughan v. KolbOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Jones v. Warmsprings Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Waterwatch of Oregon, Inc. v. Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Wilber v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Vandehey v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. Wilber v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Vandehey v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API