Legal Opinion

Waterwatch of Oregon, Inc. v. Water Resources Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 11, 2013No. S42117; A147071PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Petitioner WaterWatch of Oregon, Inc., seeks judicial review of a final order in a contested case in which the Water Resources Department (the department) granted the City of Cottage Grove (Cottage Grove or the city) an extension of time to perfect its water rights under a permit first issued in 1977. Petitioner contends that the department erroneously interpreted ORS 537.230(2)1 by failing to condition the permit extension on the protection of certain fish species, ORS 537.230(2)(c), and on the development of a water management and conservation plan, ORS 537.230(2)(b). It also contends that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hamel v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Teel Irrigation District v. Water Resources DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. WaterWatch of Oregon, Inc. v. Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. WaterWatch of Oregon v. Water Resources Dept.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. City of Damascus v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Bandon Pacific, Inc. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund v. Port of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API