Legal Opinion

Evanuik v. University of Pittsburgh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1975No. Appeal, No. 514PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Price, J.,

This appeal follows a jury verdict which held Karen Fishell, the additional defendant below, liable to the plaintiff in negligence. The jury exculpated appellee, University of Pittsburgh, Western Psychiatric Institute *290and Clinic (WPIC) of liability, finding either that WPIC was not negligent or that WPIC’s negligence was not the proximate cause of the death of Darlene Dobrushin, the decedent. Post-trial motions were filed and denied by the lower court en banc.

On this appeal, appellant-administratrix of decedent’s estate, Kate Evanuik, alleges two errors which she believes…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Kite v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Landis v. Conestoga Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Nirdlinger v. American District Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Erie v. Piece of LandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Quinby v. Plumsteadville Family Practice, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Pratt v. SteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. McDaniel v. Merck, Sharp & DohmeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Brisbine v. Outside in School of Experiential Education, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Jenkins v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API