Legal Opinion

Mid-Continent Supply Co. v. Hauser

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1954No. 39,067 and 39,112PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.;

This was an action to foreclose a mortgage covering two oil and gas leaseholds. The question in controversy is whether the funds from oil production from said leaseholds in the hands of the operating receiver should be applied to the unsatisfied part of the first or second mortgagee’s judgments. The appellee Mid-Continent Supply Company, a corporation, will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiff or first mortgagee, and the appellants Fred M. Hauser, Lloyd Hauser and Nolan Hauser, as second mortgagees or defendants Hauser. The pertinent facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hall v. GoldsworthySupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Hornick v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Babb v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Schultz v. StinerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Rothman v. Globe Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. HouckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  2. State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. In Re Foxhill Place AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1990
  4. Balcor Pension Investors v v. Wiston XXIV Ltd. (In Re Wiston XXIV Ltd.)District Court, D. Kansas · 1992
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. MouldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API