Legal Opinion

In Re Foxhill Place Associates

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided September 28, 1990No. 18-61422PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

KAREN M. SEE, Bankruptcy Judge.

The only issue before the court is whether a proposed settlement agreement for division of post-petition rents between debt- or Foxhill Place Associates and secured creditor Travelers Insurance Company is reasonable. William R. Riley and William C. Hanes, limited partners of debtor, objected to the settlement. The limited partners contend that Travelers’ security interest in rents is not duly perfected and that Travelers is not entitled to any rents collected by debtor post-petition. This court has…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Gotta (In Re Gotta)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1985
  3. In Re Aloma Square, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1988
  4. United States v. Landmark Park & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. Hall v. GoldsworthySupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Indian Motocycle Associates III Ltd. Partnership v. Massachusetts Housing Finance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. In Re RancourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
  3. In Re KNM Roswell Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  4. In Re Vienna Park PropertiesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  5. Sears Savings Bank v. Tucson Industrial Partners (In Re Tucson Industrial Partners)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API