Legal Opinion

Anderson v. U.S. Secretary of Agriculture

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 31, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-120; Court 05-00267PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion & Order

CARMAN, Judge.

This matter is before this Court on Defendant’s Motion to Recaption Case (“De fendant’s Motion”). Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion, Plaintiffs response, and the record before the Court, Defendant’s motion is denied.

Procedural History

On January 16, 2002, Plaintiff, Mark T. Anderson, applied for Trade Adjustment Assistance (“TAA”) as an individual producer. (Admin.R.Doc. 1.) Plaintiffs name and address are typewritten on the application form as “producer.” In the same “producer” space on the application form, “St. Patrick Inc.” has been handwritten. Both Mr.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. U.S. Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  2. Hacker v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API