Legal Opinion

Anderson v. U.S. Secretary of Agriculture

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 16, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-77; Court 05-00267PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARMAN, Judge.

This matter is before this Court on a motion for judgment on the agency record 1 filed by Plaintiff, Mark T. Anderson, and subsequent to a voluntary remand requested by Defendant, the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture (“Defendant” or “USDA”). After considering all the briefs and other papers filed in this matter and for the reasons that follow, this Court holds that the USDA’s findings of fact with regard to this matter are supported by substantial evidence on the record and that the USDA’s legal conclusions are not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Whitney Bros. v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API