Legal Opinion

Hacker v. United States Secretary of Agriculture

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 19, 2009No. Court 07-00008Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum

AQUILINO, Senior Judge:

Upon commencement of this action pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 2395 and 28 U.S.C. § 1581(d) to contest the denial of a cash benefit under the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers program by the Foreign Agricultural Service (“FAS”), U.S. Department of Agriculture, the defendant interposed a motion to remand to FAS so that

it may issue a new and more detailed decision explaining the reasons for its denial of plaintiffs’ request for certification for trade adjustment assistance (“TAA”).

I

That motion was granted, and the order of remand has brought forth a reconsidered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. CattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Van Raden v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  3. Louis Spitalny and Betty Spitalny, His Wife v. United States of America, William Erdwurm and Bart F. Erdwurm, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. Anderson v. United States Sec'y of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  5. Robert J. And Mildred Frysinger v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API