Legal Opinion

Blessing v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 17, 2010No. 09 CV 10035(HB)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

HAROLD BAER, JR., District Judge.

This proposed class action is based on the plaintiffs’ purchase of satellite digital audio radio services (“SDARS”) — commonly known as “satellite radio” — from the defendant in various locations throughout the United States. Plaintiffs claim that the 2008 merger of Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc. with XM Satellite Holdings, Inc. created a monopoly in the surviving company, Defendant Sirius XM Radio Inc. (“Defendant” or “Sirius XM”), that violates the antitrust laws codified in the Clayton Act § 7 and the Sherman Act § 2. They also allege that, as…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Digital Music Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. DeSilva v. North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  3. Meijer, Inc. v. Ferring B.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  4. Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Winfield v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API