Legal Opinion
LaSalla v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 13, 2006No. SC 17483PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether a voluntary arbitration panel is bound to apply the doctrine of claim preclusion to a second arbitration claim involving the interpretation of the same provision of a contract between the same parties. The defendant, Doctor’s Associates, Inc., appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court confirming an arbitration award in favor of the plaintiff, Michael J. LaSalla, and denying the defendant’s application to vacate the award. The defendant claims that the award: (1) violated public policy; and (2) was issued in manifest disregard…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Weiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Sosin v. SosinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- C. R. Klewin Northeast, LLC v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Department of Transportation v. White Oak Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.