Legal Opinion

In Re Will of Baity

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1983No. 8222SC1316PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Caveators assign error to the court’s decision to set aside the judgment incorporating the Family Settlement Agreement. They contend that the court’s order was unsupported by appropriate findings and conclusions.

Although the propounders’ motion for relief from the judgment was made pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1), (2), and (6), North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, the order of the trial judge does not specify the rule pursuant to which he purported to act. Because the judge found there was “newly discovered evidence” and ordered a new trial, we assume he acted pursuant to Rule…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Blankenship v. PriceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Environmental Management Commission v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Mullinax v. Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Thacker v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Stevenson v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API