Legal Opinion

Stevenson v. Stevenson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 1990No. 8926DC1385PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The judgment in this case is a consent judgment. A consent judgment incorporates the bargained agreement of the parties. In re Will of Baity, 65 N.C. App. 364, 309 S.E.2d 515 (1983), cert. denied, 311 N.C. 401, 319 S.E.2d 266 (1984). Such a judgment can only be attacked on limited grounds. The party attacking the judgment must properly allege and prove that consent was not in fact given, or that it was obtained by mutual mistake or fraud. Blankenship v. Price, 27 N.C. App. 20, 217 S.E.2d 709 (1975). Plaintiff in this case did not make a sufficient showing under this standard. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Blankenship v. PriceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. In Re Will of BaityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Fountain v. FountainCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Goff v. GoffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Herring v. HerringCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API