Legal Opinion

United States v. Union Bridge Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 9, 1906No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On Motion to Impose Sentence and Motion in Arrest of Judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, District Judge.

This is a proceeding by the United States against the Union Bridge Company, in the nature of a criminal information, for failure to alter a bridge which is an alleged obstructon to navigation. On the trial thereof no issues of fact were raised. The points of law submitted by the government were affirmed pro forma, those submitted by the bridge company denied pro forma, and a verdict of guilty, under the charge of the court, rendered by the jury. Motions were then made; one by the government to impose sentence, and one by the bridge company in arrest of judgment. In…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  3. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Ryan v. Chicago, B. & QR Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API