Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Chicago, B. & QR Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 11, 1932No. 4748PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge (alter stating the facta as above).

It is appellee’s contention, and the trial court so found, that Congress had fixed the height, type, and cost of the dam to be constructed across the Mississippi river at Alma, and that it was to he a low movable dam, of navigable type, costing $2,014,000, having a lift of 7 feet, and impounding the water of the river to an elevation of 605.7 feet above mean sea level. These specifications are hereinafter referred to as plan, 1.

It is appellee’s further contention, and the trial court so found, that, in order to provide a water depth of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  3. Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Gibson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Sutton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. 2,606.84 Acres of Land in Tarrant County, Texas, and Frank CornCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Jacques J. Creppel v. The United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Boston Edison Company v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. a Certain Tract or Parcel of Land in Chatham CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1942
  5. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Phillips v. Guy F. Atkinson Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API