Legal Opinion

Stringham v. Davis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1900No. 3142PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Clallam County. — Hon. James G. McOlinton, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

This action was brought by the respondent to recover from the appellant George H. Davis a balance *569alleged to be due respondent for services performed in clearing land, and to foreclose a lien on the land for the amount due. It is’ alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff (respondent) and defendant (appellant) entered into a written agreement, which was as follows:

“Memorandum- of agreement made this 25th day of June, 1895, between G. H. Davis, of the first, and T. W. Stringham, of the second part, witnesseth: That the party of the second…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Skeel v. ChristensonWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. PartridgeWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Mitchell v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1809
  4. Hamar v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Knapp v. CrawfordWashington Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Knudson-Jacob Co. v. BrandtWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Schultz v. Simmons Fur Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API