Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Simmons Fur Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1907No. 6712PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered November 27, 1906, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for breach of a contract of employment.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.

This is an action to recover damages for breach of contract. The plaintiff alleged in his complaint that the defendant agreed with him that, if he would remove to Seattle and enter defendant’s employment, the latter would employ him for a period of one year as a fur cutter, at a salary of $25 per week during the months of November and December, 1905, and the months of January, August, September, and October, 1906, and at a salary of $20 a week during the months from February to July inclusive, in 1906; that in reliance upon such promise and in consideration thereof, the plaintiff immediately…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newman v. BuzardWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Brown v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Smith v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Harris v. Fidalgo Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Carr v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Foley v. Community Oil Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1974
  3. Douglass v. StacheckiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Rogers v. LippyWashington Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API