Legal Opinion

Hamar v. Peterson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1894No. 1254PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

Some questions are raised as to the nature of the proceeding instituted in the lower court and as to the form of the relief granted by the judgment therein. It is also claimed on the part of the appellant that the finding of the court that a partnership had ever existed between the respondent and the appellant was unwarranted by the evidence.

It seems to us that this latter question is the only material one, for the reason that if the finding of the court upon the question of partnership was correct the other rulings do not adversely affect any…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ordway v. DowneyWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. PartridgeWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Moberg v. McCauleyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Stringham v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. O'Sullivan v. O'SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API