Legal Opinion
Smith v. Dow Chemical Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 12, 1997No. 94-CV-393S(H)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case has been referred to the undersigned by Hon. William M. Skretny for pretrial matters, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Plaintiff has filed a motion pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to compel defendants Dow and PPG to produce documents responsive to plaintiffs 6th and 7th request for production. Defendants have filed a motion for a protective order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26. For the following reasons, plaintiffs motion is granted, and defendants’ motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff claims in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- von Bulow v. von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Nancy Deitchman, Paula Renfroe, and Dr. Arthur L. Herbst, Witness-Appellee v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Dtd. January 4, 1984. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Burka v. United States Department Of Health And Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Genesco, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2014
- Carty v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2001
- Genesco, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2014