Commonwealth v. CEO
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
BOWES, J.,
Dissenting.:
¶ 1 As I believe that the majority’s disposition in this case is inconsistent with our Supreme Court’s pronouncements in Commonwealth v. Lantzy, 558 Pa. 214, 736 A.2d 564 (1999), Commonwealth v. Hall, 565 Pa. 92, 771 A.2d 1232 (2001), and Commonwealth v. Eller, 569 Pa. 622, 807 A.2d 838 (2002), as well as our recent panel decision in Commonwealth v. Fairiror, 2002 PA Super 290, 809 A.2d 396, I must respectfully dissent.
¶ 2 The facts of this case undoubtedly are egregious. Appellant’s counsel falsely told him that a direct appeal had been filed. Subsequently, Appellant’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. Gamboa-TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. PursellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.