Legal Opinion

Frankel v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 31, 2015No. 13-546CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FTC “Robocall Challenge” Contest; Disappointed Entrant; Breach of Contract Claim; Standard of Review; Effect of Exculpatory Clauses in Contest Rules; Summary Judgment.

OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WHEELER, Judge. 2

This ease arises from a contest, the “Robo-call Challenge,” sponsored by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) to develop a solution to the consumer problem of automated “roboealls.” Plaintiff David Frankel submitted an entry in the contest, and believes that his proposed solution was superior to the two winning submissions. Mr. Frankel’s claim is based upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Alaska Lumber & Pulp Company, Inc. v. Edward R. Madigan, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. First Federal Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Furgiele v. Disabled American Veterans Service FoundationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Premysler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API