Legal Opinion

Hill v. . Stansbury

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

It is provided by G. S., 128-10 (formerly C. S., 3206), that the citizen and taxpayer who sues in an action like the present and recovers, “shall receive one-third part, up to the sum of five hundred dollars, of the amount recovered, to indemnify him for his services, but the amount received by the taxpayer and citizen as indemnity shall in no case exceed five hundred dollars.” In the instant case, however, the complaint alleges “the plaintiffs disclaim any right personally to participate in the proceeds of any recovery that may be had in the suit.” Hence, no provision was made in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grumon v. RaymondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
  2. City of Monroe v. NivenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. High v. PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. High v. . PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Greene v. . StadiemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Quevedo v. DeansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Insurance Co. v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Stansbury v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API