Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Flohr

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 17, 1954No. 3447PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOLDT, District Judge.

In this action by plaintiff trustee- in bankruptcy for recovery of alleged unlawful preferences, summary judgment on the facts shown by-the pleadings is sought both by plaintiff and defendants. The admitted facts are:

Bankrupt Peterson, as a building contractor, performed construction work on a building owned by Williamson and on another owned by Favre. Defendants furnished materials for the work and gave the owners the five-day notice thereof required by the Washington Mechanics Lien Law, RCW 60.04.010 et seq. Before claims of lien were filed but within the ninety-day…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Seattle Ass'n of Credit Men v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Engstrom v. De VosDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1949
  4. Gund v. ParkeWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. San Mateo Feed & Fuel Co. v. HaywardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. FlohrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  2. Jackson v. FlohrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API