Legal Opinion

Muskin v. Gerun

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 7, 1941No. Civ. 11513PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Plaintiff, a professional acrobatic dancer, while performing her act at a café owned and operated by defendants, became impaled on a large splinter on the floor; and she brought this action to recover damages for the injuries so received, which she alleged were sustained as a result of defendants’ negligence. Defendants denied the allegations of negligence, and as special defense pleaded contributory negligence. A jury returned a verdict in defendants’ favor; and from the judgment so entered, plaintiff appeals.

The principal facts may be stated as follows: Plaintiff was a member of a…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Ornales v. WiggerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Mann v. Nutrilite, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Hedding v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API