Legal Opinion

Fenn v. Clark

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1909No. Civ. No. 676PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, granting a new trial. George H. Hutton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action for damages for personal injuries. A trial was had before a jury which brought in a verdict in favor of plaintiff.

Thereafter the court made an order setting aside the verdict and granting defendant’s motion for a new trial, from which order plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

Plaintiff alleges that while attempting to cross Main street at its intersection with Sixth street, in the city of Los Angeles, at the usual and regular crossing thereof for pedestrians, she was knocked down, permanently injured and disabled by an automobile which defendant was then and there carelessly and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. Market Street Cable RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. McKune v. Santa Clara Valley Mill & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Siemers v. EisenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Johnson v. J. C. HeitmanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Dougherty v. EllingsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Baillargeon v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API