Legal Opinion

Pierce v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1937No. 6 Div. 232PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

The evidence in this case on the part of the State tends to prove the corpus delicti, and in making out its case the State was allowed, over the objections and exceptions of the defendant, to identify and introduce, in evidence, the clothes worn by the party assaulted at the time of the difficulty, which clothes showed the rents made by the knife of defendant during the fight. These clothes were shown to have been worn by the party assaulted at the time of the difficulty, and were covered with blood, and were in the same condition as when taken from the body of the assaulted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boyette v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Hyche v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Morris v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Moye v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Barbour v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Stallings v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Snow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API