Bob T. Moore and Susan Moore v. Ashland Chemical, Inc. And Ashland Oil, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENNIS, Circuit Judge:
In this negligence case, we are called upon to determine the standards for assessing the reliability of the proffer of a clinical physician’s expert opinion as to the cause of a plaintiffs disease in the light of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). We conclude that: (1) the basic principles of the Federal Rules of Evidence recognized by Daubert apply to the admission or exclusion of every type of expert testimony; (2) a trial judge, therefore, must assess every proffer of expert testimony to determine…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Nenno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Richard Walker v. Soo Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Coastal Tankships, U.S.A., Inc. v. Anderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.