Legal Opinion

Shorten v. Judd ex rel. Runkle

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1898No. 10905PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Bourbon district court; J. D. McCleverty, judge pro tern.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J. :

This is a continuation of the litigation that was before this court in 1895, the main purpose of which is the setting aside of the will of William Judd, deceased, and the partition of real estate owned by him at the time of his death. (Shorten v. Judd, 56 Kan. 43, 42 Pac. 337.) A brief summary of the undisputed facts is that William Judd married Mary Toler on October 10, 1880, and a daughter, Jennie L. Judd, was born to them October 7, 1881. Early in 1882, a separation occurred, which was shortly followed by a decree of divorce, granted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Shorten v. Judd ex rel. RunkleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Moffett v. Commerce Trust CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Crump v. LanhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Kentucky Bank & Trust Co. v. PritchettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Aten v. TobiasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API