Legal Opinion

State v. Kinney

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 28, 2010No. 2 CA-CR 2010-0004PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant Nathan Kinney was convicted of possession of a deadly weapon by a prohibited possessor. The trial court suspended the imposition of his sentence and placed Kinney on two years of probation. On appeal, Kinney argues the court erred in denying his motion to suppress a statement he made to a police officer after he was arrested. And, he contends, without that statement, there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 In reviewing the denial of a motion…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Nelson Ivan Boteo-FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Azore, LLC v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. State of Arizona v. Feliciano Ontiveros-LoyaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. State of Arizona v. Matthew Thomas SnyderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API