Legal Opinion

Adams v. Curry

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1942No. 3 Div. 374PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The appellants own and operate a sawmill in Bullock County, located in a rural ■section, with a cutting capacity of 5,000 feet of lumber per day. For the privilege ■of operating said mill they have procured a license, and paid the privilege tax levied by § 585 of the Code of 1940, Title 51. To ■quote from the stipulation of facts on which the case was tried: “At complainant’s plant in Midway, Alabama, complainant has a planing mill, which said planing mill is used for dressing and edging lumber cut at the sawmill belonging to complainant, and for dressing and edging lumber…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. State v. DownsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. City of Mobile v. RichardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Mayor of Tuscaloosa v. HolczsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. City of Mobile v. Craft & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. In Re Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. State v. Grayson Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. State v. HoltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. State v. HoltAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API