Legal Opinion

City of Mobile v. Craft & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the City Court of Mobile. Tried before the lion. O. J. Semmes. cited Dill. Mun. Oorp., §§ 90-91, 316; Vanhook v. Selma, 70 Ala. 361; 15 Conn. 475 ; 38 La. Ann'. 328.

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

— Craft & Co. were fined by the Mayor of Mobile for violating a city ordinance which imposed a license tax upon persons engaged in the business of retailing cigars. The case was appealed to the City Court, and there the court overruled the demurrers interposed to the pleas of the defendant. The case was then tried without the intervention of a *157jury, under section 2744 of the Code. The court found the facts to be as set up in the pleas of the defendant, and entered judgment accordingly.

The city ordinance fixing and establishing the rate of license tax for the year commencing March 35th, 1890,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Adams v. CurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. City of Mobile v. RichardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Gambill v. Endrich Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. Mayor of Tuscaloosa v. HolczsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API