State v. Holt
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
STAKELY, Justice.
The Court of Appeals found from the evidence that the defendant was a manufacturer of lumber and sold his manufactured product from his- plant at Elmore. About 95.% of his raw material was acquired from tracts of timber owned by him and cut with his own sawmills. About 5% of his raw material was acquired in a rough state from parties who owned their own timber and operated their own sawmills. With small exception all the raw material was processed through defendant’s plant at Elmore. He paid his sawmill license but the state contends that he is also liable for a wholesale…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chattanooga Plow Co. v. HaysTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Mayor of Ensley v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- State v. Coastal Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Nash v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- State v. DownsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Grayson Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- BUTLER AND KENNAMER WHOLESALE COMPANY v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- BUTLER AND KENNAMER WHOLESALE COMPANY v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974