Legal Opinion

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 15, 1928No. Docket Nos. 13562, 13563, 13747PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1021OPINION.

Milliken :

The facts of these proceedings were either stipulated or consist of admissions made by respondent in his pleadings.

These proceedings inyolve two distinct classes of issues: those which relate to taxable income, and those which relate to invested capital. We will first dispose of the issues relating to taxable income.

Issue 1. Respondent refused to permit petitioner to deduct from gross income amounts paid by it to the United States as penalties for the violation of certain Federal statutes which are referred to in the findings of fact. This question was before us in Great…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State of Washington v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  2. G. M. Standifer Constr. Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  3. Wagner v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  4. Michigan Cent. R.R. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  5. Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API