Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Kelso

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1932No. 30,800PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action for damages for personal injuries in which plaintiff recovered, and defendants have appealed.

The material facts disclosed by the evidence may be thus stated: Buford F. Kelso and Fred Smithgall are partners, doing business as the Kelso Hay and Grain Company. They lease from Charles A. Lynch a building situated in the industrial district of Kansas City in which they conduct their business. The building faces south on Pacific street and has a frontage of perhaps 100 feet. Directly in front of the building, and extending into…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. ColumbiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. City of Salina v. TrosperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Evans v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Healer v. InkmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Holitza v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kanatser v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  2. Graham v. Loper Electric Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. Duckers v. LynchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Blankenship v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, a Corporation v. Arzola Virginia Preston, as Administratrix of the Estate of Eugene H. Preston, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API