Caloric Corp. v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
Employer Caloric Corporation appeals an order of - the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, which held that claimant Richard L.. Emerich, a former Caloric employee, was not disqualified from receiving benefits under Section 402(e) of the Unem*184ployment Compensation Law,1 which precludes payment of benefits to individuals terminated from employment for willful misconduct.
At the hearing before a referee, the employer’s only witness, its director of personnel, testified that the claimant Was fired for selling company products for personal gain.2 To support this…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Harmon v. Mifflin County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Harring v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Evans v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- COM., DEPT. OF ENV. RES. v. MarraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- BMY v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.