Legal Opinion

Ohio Ex Rel. Skaggs v. Brunner

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 25, 2008No. 08-4585PublishedCited by 226 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On November 4, 2008, more than 27,000 voters in Franklin County cast provisional ballots in the various federal, state and local election contests. In reviewing those ballots, the Franklin County Board of Elections determined that roughly 1,000 of them have a potential defect: They do not contain the printed name or signature of the voter. That omission implicates two questions of state law. First, does Ohio law require a provisional ballot to include the name and signature of the voter in order to be eligible to be counted? See Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 3505.183(B)(1). Second, if Ohio law…

3Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by226 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Hamilton County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  2. Tammy Berera v. Mesa Medical Group, PLLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  3. The Standard Fire Insurance Co v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. BrunnerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
  5. Dillon v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014

221 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API