Fitz v. Synthes (USA)
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOWE, Chief Justice:
¶ 1 Plaintiff Terry Fitz brought this action against defendant Synthes USA (hereafter “Synthes”), seeking compensatory and punitive damages allegedly caused by the breakage of bone screws manufactured by Synthes that had been surgically implanted in his lower spine. Fitz’s complaint alleged negligence, strict liability in tort, breach of express and implied warranties, and failure to warn. At trial, a jury returned a special verdict in favor of Fitz in the amount of $70,609 on the implied warranty claim only. Synthes now appeals the judgment entered on that verdict…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Heslop v. Bank of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Fredrickson v. MAWUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Tingey v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Moore v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johns v. CR BardDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Siddoway v. GSK (In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017