City of Maumee v. Geiger
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The question presented is whether a person may properly be tried and convicted for receiving *240stolen property after he admits the actual, theft of that same property. ■ '
Section 134.17 of the Maumee Municipal Code and R. C. 2913.51 use the same language to identify the crime of receiving stolen property: “No person shall receive, retain, or dispose of property of another, knowing or having reasonable cause to believe it has been obtained through commission of a theft offense. * * *”
Appellants admit their roles as thieves in this cause, and rely upon the following cases for their proposition…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. BottaOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Cartwright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- State v. TindallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
3Cited by94 opinions
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. CabralesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.