Legal Opinion

People v. Ross

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 1969No. Crim. 14613PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

were each charged by information with two counts of robbery in violation of Penal Code section 211, with two counts of kidnaping for the purpose of robbery in violation of Penal Code section 209, and defendant Ross was charged with, receiving stolen property in violation of Penal Code section 496. After a second trial by jury (following an initial mistrial because the jury was unable to' reach a verdict) each defendant was found “guilty” of both of the robbery counts and the degree was set as first; each defendant was found “guilty” of one but “not guilty” of the other kidnaping for robbery…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. RollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. MutchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Wright v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API