Legal Opinion

Hazelwood v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided March 15, 1996No. A-3452PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

BRYNER, Chief Judge.

Joseph J. Hazelwood was convicted by a jury of negligent discharge of oil. This court reversed his conviction on appeal; we held that Hazelwood was immune from prosecution and directed that the charge be dismissed. Hazelwood v. State, 836 P.2d 943 (Alaska App.1992). The Alaska Supreme Court subsequently reversed our decision and remanded the case to us. State v. Hazelwood, 866 P.2d 827 (Alaska 1993). On remand, we hold that Hazelwood’s prosecution was permissible under the inevitable discovery doctrine, but we conclude that the trial court erred in ruling…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. ZapataCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. James Thomas CherryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HazelwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hazelwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1999
  4. State v. HazelwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. HazelwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API