United States v. Zapata
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents questions concerning the legality of an investigatory stop, a war-rantless automobile search, and an ensuing interrogation. Contrary to appellant’s importuning, we hold that the Supreme Court’s opinion in California, v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991), did not reconfigure the doctrine of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and, therefore, did not transmogrify the law governing investigatory stops. Thus, we conclude on the facts of this case that a slight physical touching by a police…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by212 opinions
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. RossTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. Acosta-ColonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Gonzalez Abreau v. Banco CentralCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Morelli v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.