Legal Opinion

Young v. One Hundred & Forty Thousand Hard Brick

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 30, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

Tlie libelant claims demurrage for eight days’ delay in the discharge of a cargo of 252,500 brick taken on board the scow Riley & Rose at Roseton,afew miles above Newburg, on September 5,1894. The bricks were shipped by the manufacturers, and had not been sold when loaded. In accordance with the usual practice, the scow proceeded to the foot of Fifty-Second street, New York, to wait for a sale of the brick and orders for delivery. The cargo was soon after sold by the manufacturers to Mr. Peck, and the scow was directed to deliver the brick at the foot of Canal street, to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walls v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. The EddySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Isaksson v. WilliamsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1886
  4. The InnocentaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Trading Corp. v. Newmark Grain Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Etna Forge & Bolt Co. v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
  3. Westing House Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Radio-Craft Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API