Legal Opinion
Westing House Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Radio-Craft Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 29, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BODINE, District Judge.
The plaintiff in this suit is the assignee of United States letters patent No. 1,113,149, granted October 6, 1914, to Edwin H. Armstrong, of Yonkers, N. Y., for a wireless receiving system. The patent was adjudged valid in the case of Edwin H. Armstrong and Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co. (D. C.) 279 Fed. 445, affirmed in the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 280 Fed. 584. As to the defendant, the De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Company (hereinafter called the De Forest Company), the patent is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Second Nat. Bank v. Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- Armstrong v. De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- Adams v. OtterbackSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lucey Manufacturing Corp. v. Oil City Iron WorksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930