Legal Opinion
Akef v. BASF Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 7, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
DREIER, J.A.D.
Petitioner Ahmed Akef appeals from the dismissal of his workers’ compensation claim petitions against three of his former employers, BASF Corp., Chemo Dynamics, Inc., and Celotex Corp. The judge of compensation determined that under Bond v. Rose Ribbon & Carbon Mfg. Co., 42 N.J. 308, 200 A.2d 322 (1964), *32petitioner’s claim for a cumulative occupational disease was properly brought against the current employer when, as Bond states, the disease is disclosed “by medical examination, work incapacity, or manifest loss of physical function.”…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Dressler v. Grand Rapids Die Casting Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Martin Company v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Akef v. BASF Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Akef v. BASF Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Walsh v. RCA/General Electric Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000