Horrabin Paving Co. v. City of Creston
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtDonegan, J.
On July 27,1925, the Horrabin Paving Company submitted to the city of Crestón, Iowa, its proposal to do certain work upon four certain streets of said city upon which the pavement had become somewhat worn and out of repair, and, on the same day, the city of Crestón, by resolution of its city council, accepted this proposition. On the following- day, July 28, 1925, the paving- company and the city entered into four separate contracts, one for each of said streets, covering the proposed work and material to be furnished by the paving company. The four contracts were identical in form and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Head & Amory v. Providence Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1804
- Cedar Rapids Water Co. v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- District Township of Dubuque v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
- Dickinson v. . City of PoughkeepsieNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. City of PrescottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Elview Construction Co. v. North Scott Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- MADRID LUMBER COMPANY v. Boone CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Ground Control, LLC v. Capsco Industries, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2013
- Bozied v. City of BrookingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.