Murff v. State

The issues presented' by this appeal are succinctly stated in plaintiff-in-error’s brief as involving “the sufficiency of a warrant issued by the general sessions court charging appellant with, ‘driving while under the influence of an intoxicant’ and, further, the validity of the action of the circuit judge, where said warrant was challenged, in permitting the district attorney-general to amend the warrant by adding: ‘Driving an automobile *113while under the influence of an intoxicant npon a public highway.’ ”

There is no bill of exceptions and Murff relies exclusively on his legal contentions…